What we learnt from 188 pre-Mother's Day emails
By Miri Thomas | Publication date: 16/03/2010 | Category:
Views >
CataBLOGue e-business
As our UK readers are well aware, this past Sunday was Mother’s Day —a
major event in the gift-giving calendar. You’d assume, as I did, that most of
the email newsletters landing in my inbox in the days prior would have a special
Mother’s Day offer—at the very least a cursory note not to forget 14th March. So
it came as quite a revelation that out of a total of 188 promotional emails from
cataloguers and online retailers received between 3rd March and 11th March*, 112
emails, or 59.6 percent of them, did not reference Mother’s Day at
all.
As expected, business-to-business merchants didn’t promote Mother’s
Day. I received emails from Slingsby, Machine Mart, Filplastic, and Teknomek
that understandably did not factor Mother’s Day into their promotions. Out of
those emails, my favourite was Teknomek, which used the opportunity to let
recipients know of its presence at an upcoming trade show.
British mums
must not be very sporty if the emails I received are anything to go by. Two
golf-equipment retailers, County Golf and Direct Golf, sent out enewsletters
during that (extended) week and neither suggested buying mum a new set of clubs
for Mother’s Day. Derby House, a cataloguer that specialises in equine-related
equipment and accessories, sent us at least four emails during the period and
none gave us a mother-related special offer. Further, snow and surf brands
Ellis Brigham,
Extremepie,
and
Blue
Tomato were just too cool to promote mums.
Also surprising was that
quite a few apparel brands decided not to send out Mother’s Day-related offers.
Kaleidoscope,
Joe
Browns, and
Plumo were among
those that didn’t mention Mother’s Day in any of their emails. The “worst
offenders” in this category, however, were
Wall
London and
Wallis. Wall sent three
emails during that week and Wallis sent five—none promoted Mothering Sunday.
This was made even worse by Wallis’s inclusion of a competition that would have
been a perfect Mother’s Day hook. It was offering a two-night Champneys Spa
break for the recipient and a friend. Why it did not add “or take your mum!” to
the offer is beyond me.
Many of the retailers sent us more than one email during that week. This
gave them scope to send one email with a Mother’s Day offer, and one without. Of
those that sent us multiple messages,
Roman
Originals targeted the more organised of shoppers. It sent out an email on
the 4th March with an offer for Mother’s Day; five days later, the offer was
removed from the email. The same tactic was used by
Baker Ross,
Past Times, and
John
Lewis. Curiously, lingerie etailer Figleaves approached it the other way
round. Its emails sent prior to 9th March were Mother’s Day-free zones. However,
come the 9th,
Figleaves’
subject line was: New spring arrivals, 20% off lingerie offer + 20% off
nightwear - perfect for Mother's Day!
Neom
Organics also made a point of targeting last-minute shoppers on 9th March
with the subject line: FREE Gift & Mother's Day Special Offers.

What
did we learn from 188 pre-Mother's Day emails? That the majority of retailers
aren't concerned with Mother's Day at all. So what were they promoting if not
Mother’s Day? Seven percent promoted spring—or new arrivals for spring—whilst
just two percent promoted Easter. Most of the offers focused either on specific
ranges, promoting existing sales, or pushing product.
Of the 112 emails that didn’t promote Mother’s Day my favourites
were:
Boden
Sent on 4th March with the subject line
“Today's your last chance for 15% off at Boden, online. Shop now or miss out”,
Boden’s email appeals to my cute
receptors. It sent a similar email six months ago, I liked
that one too!
Hotel
ChocolatAlthough the email has a tab labelled Mother’s Day, it
didn’t directly promote Mother’s Day offers. What it did promote were Easter
eggs—and lots of them. The email has an almost irresistible selection of
chocolate eggs (irresistible because I cannot justify spending £22 on one Easter
egg). Despite the amount of product featured in this email, it’s not confusing
and doesn’t seem crowded.
Hotel
Chocolat called it its “Easter Eggs-ibition”, and it certainly seems to have
a gallery feel to it. I particularly like the graphic at the bottom which
compares the egg sizes to one another—a little “happy” egg right through to a
giant chocolaty “Ostrich” egg.

Oli This gets top marks for concept rather than
execution. Received on 10th March—three days after the Academy Awards
ceremony—the email from fashion etailer
Oli
is titled “The Oli Awards are here”. The categories are Best red-carpet dress,
Hottest heels, and Must have accessory. There are three nominees and a winner. I
like the idea—but the follow-through is lacklustre. Why did that green dress, or
those platform shoes, win? Are they the most popular with customers? What makes
them better than the other pieces in the list? The pieces were chosen by Oli
staff, but there’s no reason behind their choices. What I’d liked to see is a
pre-Oscars competition where Oli customers vote on their favourite pieces. The
winner gets her favourite item and the reason for loving it into the email.
Maybe next year?

*
Why did I choose the 3rd to 11th March? For a start, I factored in delivery
dates; the 11th fell on a Thursday which still enabled delivery by Saturday. The
3rd was chosen to allow for emails with an early-bird offer to be included.
