
We can all agree that email is a powerful sales tool, and a primary means for
direct sellers to contact their customers. So when email goes wrong, it can have
a big impact on the sender. Not least in lost sales, but also brand
damage.
Just last week, I was contacted by a reader--let’s call him Mr C.
Mr C had received an email from a children’s furniture cataloguer/etailer
promising 20 percent off selected items in the new spring range. The well
laid-out and colourful email highlighted a number of items in the main body
copy. Mr C therefore assumed, as I’m sure we all would, that all the products
featured in the email would be eligible for the discount. They weren’t. Three
out of the nine products featured in the email were excluded from the promotion,
making Mr C a very frustrated shopper. He took the view that the email was
trying to “manipulate the trust of a customer”, and said he had no faith in the
brand any more. Did it lose the sale? Yes.
I had a similar experience
this weekend. I received an email from an etailer with a sale on wallets.
Feeling tempted by a half-price offer I clicked through to the page and tried to
add the wallet to my basket. Despite the website telling me that the item was in
stock, my basket remained empty. I tried adding other items and coming back to
the wallet, but to no avail. This company did not want to part with its wallet.
Did it lose the sale? Yes. Did someone else get the sale? Yes.
Unlike Mr
C though, my experience hasn’t put me off the wallet company altogether. Maybe I
am more forgiving. Or maybe it’s because the items he was shopping for were
pricey exclusive designs, whereas my same wallet could be found just a click
away—albeit at full price. Would either of us shop at those companies again?
Possibly, but it won’t be our first port of call.
I wouldn't go as far as
saying these email blunders delivered killer blows to the brand, but they
certainly dented confidence.
*Mandatory fields your email address will not be published. All comments are moderated and may be edited. Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Catalog Development Centre Ltd.